Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Furness vs Amadatus Admiraal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Furness vs Admiraal analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Furness vs Amadatus Admiraal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Furness 1 - 0 Admiraal
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Furness has won 44.88% of points on their second serve, while Admiraal has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Furness, in recent form, has won 51.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Admiraal has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.3% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Furness has saved 55.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Admiraal has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Furness has won 45.16% of matches played (W/L 14/ 17), with Admiraal winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Admiraal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 16/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Admiraal has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Furness winning 1 times and Admiraal being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Furness winning 2 and Admiraal winning 0. The last match between Furness and Admiraal was at the M15 Bad Salzdetfurth, 08-10-2019, First, Carpet with Evan Furness getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Furness and Admiraal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Furness winning 0 times and Admiraal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Furness winning 0, and Admiraal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Furness has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.52 while Admiraal has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Furness has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Admiraal has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Furness has converted 47.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Admiraal has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
848
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
58% (290-206)
Career Total W/L
47% (17-19)
45% (14-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,730
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Evan Furness vs Amadatus Admiraal For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Furness VS Admiraal
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Evan Furness | Amadatus Admiraal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (29/49) | 76% (41/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (25/29) | 61% (25/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (14/20) | 54% (7/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (22/54) | 20% (10/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Evan Furness
Player
Amadatus Admiraal
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Furness | Amadatus Admiraal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (14/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (33/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (314/333) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 63 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 215.52 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1273/2122) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (803/1273) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (381/849) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (102/215) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (844/1990) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (13/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (15/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Oscar Lacides
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alexis Gautier
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Evan Furness
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Amadatus Admiraal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Amadatus Admiraal
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandre Metreveli
Player
Amadatus Admiraal
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amadatus Admiraal
Player
Sidane Pontjodikromo
62%
(
82 of
133)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
61 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Amadatus Admiraal
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amadatus Admiraal
Player
Bart Stevens
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amadatus Admiraal
Player
Michiel De Krom
66%
(
91 of
138)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
128)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
64 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
128)
129
Total Points Won
137
|
2-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amadatus Admiraal
Player
Paul Woerner
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amadatus Admiraal
Player
Conor Berg
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Furness Vs Admiraal Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Furness are available here and Admiraal photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
